Next article Search Articles Instructions for authors  Access Statistics | Citation Manager  
ORIGINAL ARTICLE  
[LN]

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed3385    
    Printed196    
    Emailed1    
    PDF Downloaded57    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 2    

Recommend this journal

Surgery of subacromial syndrome with application of plasma rich in growth factors


Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology Service, University Hospital Nuestra Señora de Valme, Seville, Spain

Correspondence Address:
A Jimenez-Martin
2Urb. Al-Alba, C/ Brisa, no. 10, D. Sevilla
Spain
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0973-6042.57932

Rights and Permissions

Year : 2009  |  Volume : 3  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 28-33

 

SEARCH
Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles

  Article in PDF (466 KB)
Email article
Print Article
Add to My List
Background: Our objective was to evaluate clinical recovery of patients with subacromial syndrome, after administering them plasma rich in growth factors (PRGF) by means of the Constant, University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and Dissabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) tests. Materials and Methods: Prospective cohort study involving two groups - group A, treated with PRGF (52 patients); and group B, without PRGF treatment (79 patients). We analyzed the clinical situation preoperatively (time 1), at 1 month (time 2) and after rehabilitation (time 3). Results: We considered 131 patients (71.2% were men, with median age of 53.7 years). Different approaches were used - traditional (62.5%), mini-open (22.5%) and arthroscopic (15%), without significant differences (P= .71). We observed improvement in the Constant test results at time 2 (59.8 ± 11.5 points in group A vs. 13.2 ± 7.1 points in group B; P < .05) and at time 3 (79.3 ± 11.6 points in group A vs. 59.7 ± 20.1 points in group B; P < .05). We found improvement in the UCLA test results at time 2 (23.2 ± 5.8 points in group A vs. 4.72 ± 1.1 points in group B; P < .05) and at time 3 (32.1 ± 5.3 points in group A vs. 22.1 ± 7.35 points in group B; P < .05). We also observed improvement in the DASH test results at time 2 (45.2 ± 17.2 points in group A vs. 118.3 ± 7.6 points in group B, P < .05) and at time 3 (37.3 ± 12.6 points in group A vs. 69 ± 25.7 points in group B). Time of rehabilitation reduced significantly: 2.53 months in group A vs. 4.96 months in group B (P < .05). No significant differences were observed in surgical times: 88 minutes (group A) vs. 97 minutes (group B). Conclusion: In our experience, PRGF should be indicated in subacromial syndrome and cuff involvement, as shown by the improvement in our results in terms of better results of tests, reduction in rehabilitation time and no increase in operation time.






[FULL TEXT] [PDF]*
 

 


 

 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
 
 
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
  *
 * Requires registration (Free)
 
 ORIGINAL ARTICLE
 




Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology Service, University Hospital Nuestra Señora de Valme, Seville, Spain

Correspondence Address:
A Jimenez-Martin
2Urb. Al-Alba, C/ Brisa, no. 10, D. Sevilla
Spain
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0973-6042.57932

Rights and Permissions

Background: Our objective was to evaluate clinical recovery of patients with subacromial syndrome, after administering them plasma rich in growth factors (PRGF) by means of the Constant, University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and Dissabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) tests. Materials and Methods: Prospective cohort study involving two groups - group A, treated with PRGF (52 patients); and group B, without PRGF treatment (79 patients). We analyzed the clinical situation preoperatively (time 1), at 1 month (time 2) and after rehabilitation (time 3). Results: We considered 131 patients (71.2% were men, with median age of 53.7 years). Different approaches were used - traditional (62.5%), mini-open (22.5%) and arthroscopic (15%), without significant differences (P= .71). We observed improvement in the Constant test results at time 2 (59.8 ± 11.5 points in group A vs. 13.2 ± 7.1 points in group B; P < .05) and at time 3 (79.3 ± 11.6 points in group A vs. 59.7 ± 20.1 points in group B; P < .05). We found improvement in the UCLA test results at time 2 (23.2 ± 5.8 points in group A vs. 4.72 ± 1.1 points in group B; P < .05) and at time 3 (32.1 ± 5.3 points in group A vs. 22.1 ± 7.35 points in group B; P < .05). We also observed improvement in the DASH test results at time 2 (45.2 ± 17.2 points in group A vs. 118.3 ± 7.6 points in group B, P < .05) and at time 3 (37.3 ± 12.6 points in group A vs. 69 ± 25.7 points in group B). Time of rehabilitation reduced significantly: 2.53 months in group A vs. 4.96 months in group B (P < .05). No significant differences were observed in surgical times: 88 minutes (group A) vs. 97 minutes (group B). Conclusion: In our experience, PRGF should be indicated in subacromial syndrome and cuff involvement, as shown by the improvement in our results in terms of better results of tests, reduction in rehabilitation time and no increase in operation time.






[FULL TEXT] [PDF]*


        
Print this article     Email this article